New sports governance laws in India, including the National Sports Governance Act and related rules, are raising concerns about potential interference with the autonomy of the Indian Olympic Association and the country's bid to host the 2036 Olympic Games in Ahmedabad. The laws expand state authority, mandate internal appeals before CAS, and delay federation elections, potentially conflicting with Olympic Charter principles. The IOC previously suspended the Indian Olympic Association in 2012 due to government interference, and a similar outcome is a risk if the new framework is perceived as political control. The effectiveness of the new domestic dispute resolution system is also questioned, as lengthy processes could hinder athletes' careers.

The return of Russian and Belarusian athletes to the Winter Olympics remains a complex and evolving process. The IOC and international federations are navigating a fragmented landscape of decisions, political pressure, and exceptions, with each federation adopting different approaches. Some sports, like skiing and figure skating, have opened the door to neutral participation, while others, like biathlon and ice hockey, maintain stricter restrictions. The situation is further complicated by ongoing political debates and the IOC's efforts to balance principles with geopolitical realities.